<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.8.4" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>www.ohiocompensationlawyer.com</title>
	<link>http://www.ohiocompensationlawyer.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:17:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Substantial Aggravation:   The More Things Change . . .</title>
		<description>“Injury” for workers’ compensation purposes includes an aggravation of a pre-existing disabling condition.  Ackerman v. Indus. Comm. (1936), 131 Ohio St. 371, 3 N.E.2d 794.  This proposition is derived from the underlying axiom that the workers’ compensation system does not presuppose a worker will meet any prescribed standard ...</description>
		<link>http://www.ohiocompensationlawyer.com/blog/uncategorized/substantial-aggravation-the-more-things-change/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
